Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences https://miss.psychopen.eu/index.php/miss <h1 class="font-weight-bold" style="color: #58748f; font-size: x-large;">Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences</h1> <h2 class="font-weight-bold" style="color: #646464;">Devoted to the development and improvement of high-quality open access measurement instruments</h2> <h2 class="font-weight-bold" style="color: #646464;"><em>Free of charge for authors and readers</em></h2> <hr noshade="noshade" size="”5″"> <p><br><em>Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences</em> (MISS) is an interdisciplinary scholarly journal for the social sciences. The journal publishes high-quality, open access measurement instruments intended for scientific use across various disciplines (e.g., sociology, psychology, education, political science, economics etc.) or as adaptations in local cultural contexts. Though focusing mainly on social surveys for the general population, instruments may also be relevant for the study of individual differences and useful in specific diagnostic contexts of relevance to the general population. MISS advances social science measurement and methodology also through systematic reviews, test reviews, meeting reports, and best practice approaches related to specific tools and measurement in general. MISS expects empirical backing up of scientific claims, predominantly by a quantitative approach.&nbsp;</p> <p>MISS is <strong>indexed</strong> (amongst others) in:</p> <ul> <li><a href="http://www.apa.org/pubs/databases/psycinfo/index.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noopener">PsycINFO</a></li> <li><a href="https://app.dimensions.ai/discover/publication" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Dimensions</a></li> <li><a href="https://app.scilit.net/sources/96159" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Scilit</a></li> <li><a href="https://essentials.ebsco.com/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">EBSCO</a></li> </ul> en-US <p>Authors who publish with Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences (MISS) agree to the following terms:<br><a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img style="border-width: 0; float: right; margin-right: 2em; margin-bottom: 1em;" src="https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png" alt="Creative Commons License"></a>Articles are published under the <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</a> (CC BY 4.0). Under the CC BY license, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors grant others permission to use the content of publications in MISS in whole or in part provided that the original work is properly cited. Users (redistributors) of MISS are required to cite the original source, including the author's names, MISS as the initial source of publication, year of publication, volume number and DOI (if available).<br>Authors may publish the manuscript in any other journal or medium but any such subsequent publication must include a notice that the manuscript was initially published by MISS.&nbsp;Authors grant MISS the right of first publication. Although authors remain the copyright owner, they grant the journal the irrevocable, nonexclusive rights to publish, reproduce, publicly distribute and display, and transmit their article or portions thereof in any manner.</p> editors@miss.psychopen.eu (Beatrice Rammstedt) support@miss.psychopen.eu (PsychOpen Technical Support Team) Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:25:23 -0800 OJS 3.1.2.4 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 German Translation of the Four-Item Mentalising Index (FIMI-G) https://miss.psychopen.eu/index.php/miss/article/view/12249 <p>Mentalising can be defined as the social-cognitive ability to understand and infer the mental non-emotional states of oneself and others. Recently, the Four-Item Mentalising Index (FIMI), a self-report scale, was developed to efficiently measure mentalising ability in English-speaking samples. This study presents a German translation of the FIMI—namely, the Four-Item Mentalising Index-German (FIMI-G). To assess the usefulness of the translation, initial evidence for the psychometric properties of the FIMI-G was gathered in a German-speaking sample from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland (N = 283). As expected, the corrected item-total correlations, the confirmatory factor analysis, and the inner consistency estimation indicated a homogenous, unidimensional measure which corresponds to the English original. In addition, the FIMI-G scores were related to the validation criteria as expected. Socially desirable responding did not undermine the validity. It is concluded that the German FIMI translation is a useful measure.</p> Alex Bertrams, Max Blaise, Ann Krispenz Copyright (c) 2024 Alex Bertrams, Max Blaise, Ann Krispenz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://miss.psychopen.eu/index.php/miss/article/view/12249 Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 -0800 Measuring Organizational Transparency With 10 Items: Validation of a German Short Scale https://miss.psychopen.eu/index.php/miss/article/view/11209 <p>In recent research on transparency in organizational settings, a multidimensional understanding of supervisor transparency has gained acceptance. Following recent operationalizations, the construct can be measured by the five dimensions of Disclosure, Clarity, Accuracy, Timeliness, and Relevance of shared information. Initial applications of the scale already show its usefulness in that theoretically well-founded relationships, e.g., to trust, could be empirically supported using the instrument. As the instrument consists of twenty items, it can be too long for specific application fields. A shorter, more economical instrument is of value, especially in surveys that include many different constructs. In this article, we report on our testing of the suitability of a German shorter version consisting of only ten items. The results show that this instrument respects the dimensionality of the construct and leads to similar effects concerning its relationship to trust (-worthiness) and job satisfaction compared to the long scale. The findings also support the notion that individual transparency dimensions have different and distinct effects. Thus, the importance of a multidimensional understanding of transparency in organizational settings is also underlined by the short scale.</p> C. Richard Hossiep, Julian Märtins, Gerhard Schewe Copyright (c) 2024 C. Richard Hossiep, Julian Märtins, Gerhard Schewe https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 https://miss.psychopen.eu/index.php/miss/article/view/11209 Thu, 08 Feb 2024 00:00:00 -0800