Development of an International Survey Attitude Scale: Measurement Equivalence, Reliability, and Predictive Validity

Authors

  • Edith de Leeuw Orcid
    Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht
  • Joop Hox
    Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht
  • Henning Silber
    GESIS–Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Mannheim
  • Bella Struminskaya
    Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht
  • Corrie Vis
    CentERdata, Tilburg University, Tilburg

Abstract

Declining response rates worldwide have stimulated interest in understanding what may be influencing this decline and how it varies across countries and survey populations. In this paper, we describe the development and validation of a short 9-item survey attitude scale that measures three important constructs, thought by many scholars to be related to decisions to participate in surveys, that is, survey enjoyment, survey value, and survey burden. The survey attitude scale is based on a literature review of earlier work by multiple authors. Our overarching goal with this study is to develop and validate a concise and effective measure of how individuals feel about responding to surveys that can be implemented in surveys and panels to understand the willingness to participate in surveys and improve survey effectiveness. The research questions relate to factor structure, measurement equivalence, reliability, and predictive validity of the survey attitude scale.
The data came from three probability-based panels: the German GESIS and PPSM panels and the Dutch LISS panel. The survey attitude scale proved to have a replicable three-dimensional factor structure (survey enjoyment, survey value, and survey burden). Partial scalar measurement equivalence was established across three panels that employed two languages (German and Dutch) and three measurement modes (web, telephone, and paper mail). For all three dimensions of the survey attitude scale, the reliability of the corresponding subscales (enjoyment, value, and burden) was satisfactory. Furthermore, the scales correlated with survey response in the expected directions, indicating predictive validity.